CFP: Phenomenology of Animality – Studia Phaenomenologica XVII (2017)

Studia Phaenomenologica XVII (2017) – Phenomenology of Animality

Info : http://www.phenomenology.ro/studia_2017/

The 2017 issue of Studia Phaenomenologica will be devoted to the phenomenology of animality. This area can be approached in at least two different ways: one can explore the fruitfulness of the problem of animal being by starting from the fundamental questions of phenomenology; or one can start from issues related to animal philosophy, and explore the explanatory potential of phenomenology in relation to this area.

Depending on the approach taken, the volume’s topic can therefore be understood either as a “phenomenology of animality” which focuses on the distinctive methodology of the phenomenological approach to the animal, or as a “phenomenology of animality” which focuses on the thematic specificity of the animal problem within the vast field of phenomenology. Thus, one might ask, on the one hand, what function can have the phenomenon of animal life within the general framework of a phenomenological research program, whether this is transcendental, ontological, hermeneutical or ethical. And, on the other hand, one might investigate the role phenomenology as such plays in the context of interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary contemporary debates about the animal which engage perspectives from biology, animal psychology, ethology, law, etc.

Accordingly, there are two intertwined questions here, and both are equally important: one refers to the significance of the animal being for phenomenology, while the other is related to the significance of phenomenology for the current field of “animal philosophy”. But then, what does the specificity of the phenomenological approach to the animal consist in? How can one identify the dimensions that distinguish and individualize the phenomenological approach in contrast to other forms of animal philosophy? By virtue of which exactly is an approach to the animal a phenomenological one?

Given the fact that the history of phenomenology reveals multifarious approaches to the animal, and thus we are not dealing with one phenomenology of animality, but with a plurality of phenomenologies, one should perhaps attempt to identify a common core or at least central factors that give coherence and unity to this field.

If the phenomenological approach must by definition be carried out in the first person, focusing in a strictly descriptive way on what is given and on what shows itself, and if, furthermore, its paramount task is that of uncovering both the structure of subjective experience and the constitutive structures of the described phenomena, then the same requirements have to be applied to the question of the animal and the diverse experiences we have with animals.

Thus, first, the phase of phenomenological reduction requires a preliminary bracketing of all scientific or philosophical theories about animals in general; in other words, phenomenology should attempt to disregard from the beginning any traditional understanding of the animal that may divert or blur the phenomenological sight.

Second, as an essentially methodical approach, phenomenology raises the question regarding the conditions of access to the being of the animal or to the animal world; from this perspective, it constantly produces a critical discourse highlighting the limits of empathy and the risks of transfer meaning from the human to the animal sphere.

Third, phenomenology starts from everyday experience of and with animals, and investigates the concrete ways these are given to us in our world of factical life, avoiding any artificial construct such as a laboratory setting.

And finally, in virtue of its originally eidetic character, phenomenology focuses on the question of the essence of the animal, the problem of the animality, and the essential structures relating the human and the animal spheres of experience.

Articles can be submitted in English, French, and German. The submissions should comply with the following guidelines: http://www.zetabooks.com/media/wysiwyg/Journals/2016_SP_FORMAL_EDITORIAL_RULES.pdf

EXTENDED DEADLINE : 15 January, 2017.

The papers should be sent to: submissions@phenomenology.ro

 

Decolonizing Critical Animal Studies, Cripping Critical Animal Studies – Conference Program

Decolonizing Critical Animal Studies, Cripping Critical Animal Studies

Conference Program

June 21-23, 2016
University of Alberta

Organized by Chloë Taylor and Kelly S. Montford

For more info on rooms and for updates on the program, check out this site.

Tuesday, June 21

2:00-3:00 p.m. – Refreshments and Registration in the Humanities Centre Fishbowl

3:00-5:00 p.m. – Welcome and Decolonizing Critical Animal Studies Plenary Panel

Decolonizing Critical Animal Studies Plenary Panel with DINESH WADIWEL, KIM TALLBEAR, AND MANEESHA DECKHA; MODERATED BY BILLY-RAY BELCOURT

5:30 p.m. – Dinner at Narayanni’s Restaurant (vegan South Indian buffet), 10131 81 Avenue

Wednesday, June 22

8:00-9:00 a.m. – continental breakfast in the Humanities Centre Fishbowl
9:00-10:00 a.m.: Concurrent Individual Papers

A. ‘Animal Crips’ and Cripping Animal Liberation

Ryan Sweet, “Chickens with Cork Legs and Dogs with Dentures: Representations of Prostheticised Animals in Late Nineteenth-Century Periodicals”

Hannah Monroe, “Neurodiversity and Animal Liberation: Challenging Hegemonic Constructions of Normalcy”

B. Indigenous Epistemologies

Danielle Taschereau Mamers, “Decolonizing the plains: bison life beyond colonial commodification”
Brandon Kerfoot, “Seals that club back: Animal Revenge in Alootook Ipellie’s Arctic Dreams and Nightmares”

C. Critical Engagements with the Work of Temple Grandin

Chair: Lindsay Eales

Vasile Stanescu, “Lost in Translation: Temple Grandin, ‘Humane Meat’ and the Intersection of Oppression”

Vittoria Lion, “Disrupting Temple Grandin: Resisting a ‘Humane’ Face for Autistic and Animal Oppression”

D. Settler Colonialism and Animals

Fiona Probyn-Rapsey, ‘Dog whistling: Australian settler colonialism and the dingo’

Presenters: Fiona Probyn-Rapsey and Dinesh Wadiwel (Co-authors: (presenters plus Sue Donaldson, George Ioannides, Tess Lea, Kate Marsh, Astrida Neimanis, Annie Potts, Nik Taylor, Richard Twine, Stuart White), ‘Sydney’s sustainability and campus food justice workshop”

10:15-12:00 – Cripping Critical Animal Studies Plenary Panel

Plenary panel with Stephanie Jenkins, Sunaura Taylor, and A. Marie Houser
moderated by Vittoria Lion

12:00-1:00 – lunch in the Humanities Centre Fishbowl

1:00-2:30 p.m.: Concurrent Individual Papers

A. Gender, Disability, and Animality (Undergraduate Student Panel)

Samuella Jo Johnson, “Institutionalized Space: Dehumanization and the Masking of Violence”

James Harley, “The Trouble with Animal Rights Activism: Emotion Work is Women’s Work”

Dylan Hallingstad O’Brien, “‘We Are Humans!’: Animality as Disability in Yusuke Kishi’s Shinsekai Yori”

B. Settler Colonial Imaginings of Nature and Animals

Ben O’Heran, “Henry David Thoreau, the Unsettled Settler: Exploring Environmentalism as a Means of Usurping Indigenous Place-Thought”

Carina Magazzeni, “The Trouble with Taxidermy: Brad Isaacs and Animalium”

Rebekah Sinclair,”Guest, Pests, or Terrorists?: The Settler-Colonial Intelligibility of ‘Invasive Species”

C. Decolonial Perspectives on Domestication and Diet

Shaila Wadhwani, “Coloniality: Nature and the Bodies of Domestication”

Jason Price, “Decolonizing Desire and Relationships with Animals and Space in The Devil’s Chimney”

Samantha King, “Consuming Animals in Theory and Practice: Conversations with Indigenous and Postcolonial Studies Scholars on the Ethics and Politics of Food”

3:00-4:00 – Seeing Animals: Crip Reflections on the Work of Sunaura Taylor

Plenary Lecture by Alison Kafer
moderated by Emilia Nielsen

4:15-5:30 p.m. Art Exhibition Opening: Works of Sunaura Taylor
FemLab (Feminist Exhibition Space), Assiniboia Hall
curated by Michelle Meagher
Wine and Cashew Cheese Reception

Thursday, June 23

8:00-9:00 a.m. – continental breakfast in the Humanities Centre Fishbowl
9:00-10:30 a.m.: Concurrent Individual Papers

A. Global Perspectives on Interlocking Oppressions

Lisa Warden, “The street dog and the slum dweller: twin victims of urban renewal in modern India”

Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond, “But American Indians Blessed the Animals Before Killing Them: Native Fetishes and Edible Others in Brazil”

Maria Elena Garcia, “Culinary Spectacles: Bodies and Violence in Peru’s Gastronomic Boom”

B. Critical Animal/ Disability Studies

Nancy Halifax and Chelsea Jones, “‘What kind of animal are you?’”

Chelsea Jones and Liz Shek-Noble, “What to Make of Lashawn Chan: An Overview of Critical Disability, Animal, and Post-colonial Studies’ Intersections in Southeast Asia and North America”

C. Philosophical Perspectives on Interlocking Oppressions

Angela Martin, “Affirmative Action for Animals?”

Syl Kocieda, “The spectre of not-quite-humans in the narrative of ‘animality’: Should we be talking about actual animals in animal advocacy?”

Frédéric Côté-Boudreau, “Enabling Autonomy for Animals and People with Cognitive Disabilities”

10:30-11:00 a.m. – refreshment break in the Humanities Centre Fishbowl

11:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. – Indigenous Food Politics

Billy-Ray Belcourt, “Reserve Dying and the Taste of Non-Sovereignty”
Margaret Robinson, “All My (Blood) Relations: Indigenous Relationality in Vegan Future”
moderated by Susanne Luhmann

12:00-1:00 p.m. – lunch in the Humanities Centre Fishbowl

1:00 – 2:15 – BOOK PANELS

A. Book panel on Dinesh Joseph Wadiwel’s The War Against Animals (Brill Press, 2015)

Chair: Chloë Taylor

Panelists: Vasile Stanescu and Kelin Emmett

Respondent: Dinesh Joseph Wadiwel

B. Book panel on Claire Jean Kim’s Dangerous Crossings: Race, Species and Nature in a Multicultural Age (Cambridge University Press, 2015)

Panelists: Kelly Struthers Montford and Christiane Bailey

Respondent: Claire Jean Kim

C. Book panel on Sunaura Taylor’s Beasts of Burden: Animal and Disability Liberation (New Press, 2016)

Chair: Danielle Peers

Panelists: Alexis Shotwell and Joshua St. Pierre

Respondent: Sunaura Taylor

2:30-3:30 – Taxonomies of Power

Plenary lecture by Claire Jean Kim
moderated by Fiona probyn-rapsey

3:30-4:00 p.m. – refreshment break in the Humanities Centre Fishbowl

5:00-8:00 p.m. visit to F.A.R.R.M. (farm sanctuary) and vegan bbq

For more info on rooms and for updates on the program, check out this site.

Decolonizing and Cripping Critical Animal Studies – Alberta 2016

CALL FOR CONFERENCE PAPERS

DECOLONIZING CRITICAL ANIMAL STUDIES,
CRIPPING CRITICAL ANIMAL STUDIES

June 21-23, 2016, at the University of Alberta, in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Program Conference is out : http://kellysmontford.com/program/

DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSIONS: January 10, 2016

Sponsored by the Faculty of Arts, the Faculty of Native Studies, and the Department of Women’s and Gender Studies at the University of Alberta

CCAS Alberta

 

Conference plenary panels will include :

Decolonizing Critical Animal Studies

Moderated by Billy-Ray Belcourt (University of Alberta) and featuring
• Kim TallBear (Associate Professor of Native Studies, University of Alberta),
• Maneesha Decka (Associate Professor of Law, University of Victoria), and
• Dinesh Wadiwel (Lecturer in Human Rights and Socio-legal Studies, University of Sydney).

Cripping Critical Animal Studies

Moderated by Vittoria Lion (University of Toronto) and featuring
• Sunaura Taylor (artist and author),
• Stephanie Jenkins (Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Oregon State University), and
• A. Marie Houser (independent writer, editor, and activist).
Taxonomies of Power, Plenary by Claire Jean Kim (UC Irvine)

Decolonizing Critical Animal Studies

The first thread of conversation that we hope to develop is that of decolonizing Critical Animal Studies. While some theorists have turned to non-Western and indigenous cultures for examples of less or nonspeciesist worldviews, the relationship between anti-colonial politics and animal activism has been fraught. Single-issue animal activist campaigns have often functioned to justify racism, xenophobia and exclusion, with, to adapt Gayatri Spivak’s phrase, white humans saving animals from brown humans. The eating of shark fins and dog meat has been marked as cruel and backward, for instance, in contrast with dominant constructions of Western diets as sophisticated and humane. Indigenous rights activists and animal activists have clashed over the issue of hunting charismatic animals, such as whales and seals, often eclipsing attention to far more widespread forms of animal, colonial, and racial oppression in Western, settler societies. Ecofeminist approaches to animal ethics have been riven over the issue of indigenous hunting; some ecofeminists, such as Marti Kheel, have expressed dismissive views of the spiritual significance of subsistence hunting for indigenous people, while others, such as Val Plumwood, Deanne Curtin, and Karen Warren, have argued for contextual rather than universalizing forms of ethical vegetarianism. More recently, decolonial scholars have shown the interconnections between animal oppression, imperialism, and settler colonialism, and the need to center race in Critical Animal Studies. Maneesha Decka, for instance, has highlighted the ways that imperialism is justified through animalizations of racial others and condemnations of the ways colonized others treat animals, even while imperial identities are constituted through the consumption of animal bodies. Billy-Ray Belcourt has argued that speciesism and animal oppression are made possible in settler colonial contexts through the prior and ongoing dispossession and erasure of indigenous people from the lands on which animals are now domesticated and exploited. Belcourt critiques the ways that Critical Animal Studies assumes and operates within the ‘givenness’ of a settler colonial state, and suggests that Critical Animal Studies should center an analysis of indigeneity and call for the repatriation of indigenous lands.

Possible presentation topics for the Decolonizing Critical Animal Studies thread include:

• The intersections of decolonial and Critical Animal Studies
• The uses of nonhuman animals in projects of land settlement
• Cultural food colonialism or decolonial food studies
• Reservization, food and fat studies
• Animal ethics and decolonization
• Animals, ontology, and settler colonialism

The Cripping of Critical Animal Studies

The second thread of conversation that we wish to pursue at this meeting is the cripping of Critical Animal Studies. Scholars working at the intersections of Critical Animal Studies and Critical Disability Studies have argued that the oppression of nonhuman animals and disabled humans are interconnected. Humans who defend animals and refrain from eating them have often found themselves labeled as cognitively disabled, mentally ill, ‘stupid’ or ‘crazy,’ and psychiatrists have proposed diagnoses for animal activists and vegans such as ‘anti vivisection syndrome’ and ‘orthorexia nervosa.’ Disabled humans, like people of colour, have been put on display along with nonhuman animals in the history of ‘freak’ shows, and disabled humans and nonhuman animals continue to have their bodies objectified and their interests sacrificed for the purposes of medical training and scientific knowledge. Disabled humans are continually compared to nonhuman animals, not only in insults but also in medical terminology, with effects that are oppressive because of the pre-existing denigration of nonhuman animals. The same claims about what makes human life ontologically distinct and morally valuable—that humans have reason, that humans have language, that humans are autonomous—justify the exclusion of both nonhuman animals and cognitively disabled humans from moral consideration, as well as the oppression of physically disabled humans who are considered ‘dependent.’ Despite these interconnecting oppressions, speciesism has characterized Critical Disability Studies as much as ableism has characterized animal rights discourse (Peter Singer, Jeff McMahan). In recent years and more productively, however, Critical Animal Studies scholars such as Sue Donaldson, Will Kymlicka, Stephanie Jenkins and Sunaura Taylor have borrowed from Critical Disability Studies scholarship to argue that the dependency and vulnerability of domesticated animals should not be a reason to devalue their lives; far from removing a human or another animal from the realm of moral concern, (inter)dependency and vulnerability are the animal (and thus human) condition. Two types of animals come immediately to mind at the intersections of Critical Disability Studies and Critical Animal Studies: the service animal and the disabled animal, and scholars such as Kelly Oliver and A. Marie Houser have provided ethical analyses of these animals drawing on both animal and disability ethics. In particular, while disability scholars have critiqued the ways we view disabled humans as pitiful, tragic, exotic, or inspirational, Houser observes that heartwarming images of disabled pigs and dogs in mobility devices function to reassure viewers that we live in a society that is extraordinarily compassionate to animals, even while actual animals have by and large disappeared from view, sequestered in institutions of exploitation, containment and death.

Possible presentation topics in the Cripping Critical Animal Studies thread include:

• Intersections of Critical Disability and Critical Animal Studies
• Critiques of the work of Temple Grandin
• The ethics of using service animals
• Representations of disabled animals
• The cultural associations between mental illness and love for animals (e.g. ‘crazy cat ladies’)

SUBMISSIONS:

FORMAT: Presentations should be 20 minutes in length, leaving 10 minutes for discussion. We are receptive to different and innovative formats including but not limited to panels, performances, workshops, and public debates. You may propose individual or group presentations, but please specify the structure of your proposal. Please be sure to include your name(s), title(s), organizational affiliation(s), field of study or activism, and A/V needs in your submission.

DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSIONS: January 10, 2016

TO SUBMIT: email an abstract of no more than 500 words and a bio of no more than 150 words to the conference organizers: Chloë Taylor (chloe3[at]ualberta[dot]ca) and Kelly Struthers Montford (kelly.sm[at]ualberta[dot]ca).

(Download the call for paper)

CFP: Philosophical Ecologies: Considerations of the Animal, the Vegetal and the Environmental

Philosophical Ecologies: Considerations of the Animal, the Vegetal and the Environmental

23rd Annual DePaul University Graduate Student Conference

February 12-13, 2016

DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois

Call for submissions – Deadline: December 1, 2015

Keynote Speaker: Cynthia Willett, Emory University

Recent research in interspecies ethics, the place of plant life, and conceptions of the environmental testifies to escalating concerns regarding the insufficiency of existing interrogations into the historical privileging of some forms of life over others. These concerns emerge from a long history of global injustices that have resulted in environmental degradation as well as marginalization of both human and nonhuman populations through such practices as speciation, colonization, feminization, criminalization and dehumanization. This conference highlights the particularly urgent need for more rigorously articulated philosophies of the animal, the vegetal, and the environmental and seeks to reconsider conceptual boundaries between natural and artificial spaces and concepts of life. Topics of interest may include, but are certainly not limited to:

  • environmental, animal, or food ethics
  • conceptions of animal, plant, and human life
  • eco-feminism
  • theoretical, political, and/or historical distinctions between the human and the nonhuman
  • environmental politics and policy
  • rights discourse and its application to nonhuman others
  • nature and the polis
  • colonization and environmental exploitation
  • eco-affectivity and interspecies attunements
  • intergenerational environmentalism
  • ethology and communication in animal and plant life
  • environmental aesthetics
  • dehumanization and oppression

Submissions from any area of study addressing these topics are welcome. Papers should be limited to 3,000 words and prepared for blind review. Please include name, university affiliation, and submission title in the body of your email, and send all submissions and inquires to: depaul.philosophy@gmail.com

Call for papers – Appel de textes – PhænEx Special Topic Issue on EROS

PHAENEX - Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture Revue de Théorie et Culture Existentialistes et Phénoménologique

Call for Papers – Appel de textes

Special Topics Issue “FACES OF EROS” / Numéro thématique annuel “FIGURES DE L’EROS”

PHAENEX – Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture
Revue de Théorie et Culture Existentialistes et Phénoménologique

Vol 12, no 1 (Spring-Summer 2017;printemps-été 2017)

PhænEx is an electronic peer-reviewed journal affiliated with the Canadian-based Society for Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture (http://eptc-tcep.net).

Special Topic Issue : Faces of Eros

Eros plays a central role in Western thought. In the philosophical and spiritual traditions, it usually refers to physical love and desire. Eros is a recurring character in the pre-Socratic cosmogonies, and it is the main impulse of the philosophical quest for truth in Plato’s Phaedrus. In the Symposium, Plato also unveils its fundamental ambiguity as half divine and half human, where the desire to merge the opposing sides involves beauty and ugliness, profusion and need. Eros is at the intersection of gift and possession, of radical openness and selfish desire, of interested disinterest and mystical transport, mixing clairvoyance and blindness. Thanks to the manifold nuances of the erotic-sensuous genius that fascinated Kierkegaard, eroticism both produces and dissolves several dimensions of human existence, sociality, understanding, and speech.  This Special Topics issue of PhænEx wishes to give a new impulse to philosophical reflections on this fundamental and ambiguous phenomenon, following an interdisciplinary perspective at the intersection of phenomenology, post-structuralism, and social sciences (psychology, sociology, sexology, anthropology, linguistics, etc.).

Submission Information

Submissions in both French and English are accepted, and all papers will be peer reviewed.

Paper submissions must be made directly through the journal’s website (www.phaenex.uwindsor.ca). Please follow the online instructions, guidelines, and stylesheet.

Deadline for submission: Oct. 1, 2016.
Please direct any questions to the Lead Editors : Élodie Boublil (CNRS-ENS), elo.boublil[a]gmail.com &  Chiara Piazzesi(UQAM), piazzesi.chiara[a]uqam.ca
PHAENEX - Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture Revue de Théorie et Culture Existentialistes et Phénoménologique

Appel de textes

Numéro thématique annuel FIGURES DE L’EROS

PHAENEX – Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture
Revue de Théorie et Culture Existentialistes et Phénoménologique

Vol 12, no 1 (Spring-Summer 2017;printemps-été 2017)

PhænEx est une revue bilingue évaluée par les pairs et publiée par la société Théorie et culture existentialistes et phénoménologiques (TCEP) (http://eptc-tcep.net). Elle se veut un forum interdisciplinaire pour la recherche sur les thèmes et les problèmes relevant de l’existentialisme et de la phénoménologie au sens large.

Numéro thématique : Figures de l’Éros

Eros exprime traditionnellement l’amour dans sa dimension sensuelle et désirante. Il a toujours occupé une place privilégiée dans la pensée occidentale : protagoniste des cosmogonies présocratiques, Eros devient, dans le Phèdre de Platon, le moteur du savoir philosophique, alors que le Banquet décèle son ambiguïté fondamentale : pris entre le divin et l’humain, ce désir d’union avec l’autre participe de la beauté et de la laideur, de l’abondance et du besoin. Eros est situé à la confluence du don et de la possession, de l’ouverture à l’autre et du désir égoïste, du désintérêt intéressé et d’un transport mystique qui se lit à la fois comme clairvoyance et comme aveuglement. Par les gradations de la génialité sensuelle qui avait fasciné Kierkegaard, l’érotisme produit et en même temps dissout des dimensions entières de l’existence, de la socialité, de la compréhension et de la parole humaines. Ce numéro thématique de la revue PhaenEx souhaite donner une impulsion nouvelle à la réflexion sur cette ambivalence fondamentale, dans une perspective pluridisciplinaire au croisement de la phénoménologie, du poststructuralisme et des sciences sociales (psychologie, sociologie, sexologie, anthropologie, linguistique, etc.).

Directives pour la soumission

La revue accepte les soumissions d’articles en français et en anglais. Tous les articles seront évalués par les pais.

Les soumissions doivent être faites directement sur le site Internet de la revue (www.phaenex.uwindsor.ca). Veuillez suivre les directives (soumission, conventions typographiques, etc.) qui apparaissent sur le site de la revue.

Date limite pour les soumissions : 1er oct. 2016.
Adressez toute question aux directrices du numéro : Élodie Boublil (CNRS-ENS), elo.boublil[a]gmail.com et  Chiara Piazzesi (UQAM), piazzesi.chiara[a]uqam.ca

Télécharger l’appel de texte : PDF (bilingue)JPG (français) JPG (anglais)

Phaenex - CFP - Special Topic EROS 2017 12-1 English Phaenex - CFP - Special Topic EROS 2017 12-1 Francais

 

Call for papers – Appel de textes – PhænEx Open Issue

PHAENEX - Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture Revue de Théorie et Culture Existentialistes et Phénoménologique

Call for Papers – Appel de textes

Annual Open Issue / Numéro non-thématique annuel

PHAENEX – Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture
Revue de Théorie et Culture Existentialistes et Phénoménologique

Vol. 11, no 2 (Fall/Automne 2016)

PhænEx is an electronic peer-reviewed journal affiliated with the Canadian-based Society for Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture (http://eptc-tcep.net).

The journal provides an interdisciplinary forum for original research in theory and culture from existential or phenomenological perspectives, broadly construed. As examples, articles on the following authors are welcomed: Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Dostoevsky, Kafka, Beckett, Husserl, Heidegger, Jaspers, Levinas, Malraux, Marcel, Buber, Frankl, Sartre, Camus, Merleau-Ponty, Beauvoir, Irigaray, etc. Papers from all disciplines and areas will be considered, following the interdisciplinary scope of PhænEx and EPTC.

Submission Information

Submissions in both French and English are accepted, and all papers will be peer reviewed.

Paper submissions must be made directly through the journal’s website (www.phaenex.uwindsor.ca). Please follow the online instructions, guidelines, and stylesheet.

Deadline for submission: March 1, 2016.
Please direct any questions to the Chair of the Editorial Collective, Martine Béland

PHAENEX - Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture Revue de Théorie et Culture Existentialistes et Phénoménologique

Appel de textes

Numéro non-thématique annuel

PHAENEX – Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture
Revue de Théorie et Culture Existentialistes et Phénoménologique

Vol. 11, no 2 (Fall/Automne 2016)

PhænEx est une revue bilingue évaluée par les pairs et publiée par la société Théorie et culture existentialistes et phénoménologiques (TCEP) (http://eptc-tcep.net). Elle se veut un forum interdisciplinaire pour la recherche sur les thèmes et les problèmes relevant de l’existentialisme et de la phénoménologie au sens large.

PhænEx vous invite à soumettre un texte pour son prochain numéro non thématique. À titre d’exemples, les articles ayant trait à des auteurs tels que Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Dostoïevski, Kafka, Beckett, Husserl, Heidegger, Jaspers, Levinas, Malraux, Marcel, Buber, Frankl, Sartre, Camus, Merleau-Ponty, Beauvoir, Irigaray, etc. sont les bienvenus. Des soumissions provenant de toutes les disciplines sont acceptées, car PhænEx, comme la société TCEP, encourage l’interdisciplinarité.

Directives pour la soumission

La revue accepte les soumissions d’articles en français et en anglais. Tous les articles seront évalués par les pais.

Les soumissions doivent être faites directement sur le site Internet de la revue (www.phaenex.uwindsor.ca). Veuillez suivre les directives (soumission, conventions typographiques, etc.) qui apparaissent sur le site de la revue.

Date limite pour les soumissions : 1er mars 2016.
SVP adresser toute question à la rédactrice en chef de la revue, Martine Béland.

Télécharger l’appel de texte : PDF (bilingue)JPG (français) JPG (anglais)

Phaenex - CFP - Open Issue 2016 11-2 Francais

Phaenex - CFP - Open Issue 2016 11-2 English